FORCED VACCINATIONS AND COVID-19 MIND CONTROL WON’T GAIN “HERD IMMUNITY”
FORCED VACCINATIONS & COVID-19 MIND-CONTROL WON’T GAIN “HERD IMMUNITY,” and WHY YOU SHOULD SHARE THIS INFORMATION
by
Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz
(MedicalVeritas.org; December 6, 2020)
Why “We Are All in This Together”
COVID-19 MIND CONTROL is largely failing because at the time of this writing more than 60% of citizens won’t submit to forced vaccinations nor “contact-tracing” in many communities.
As you can tell by the Trump Administration’s court battles over the “stolen election,” where ‘the-rubber-meets-the-road’ is in courts of law. The same is true for forced vaccinations and social impositions such as contact-tracing and mask-wearing.
In vaccination law that is used to advance forced vaccinations, also called “immunization mandates,” “general agreement” about the benefits of vaccines presumes that efficacy and safety is “generally accepted.”
Actual science is not necessary. The vaccines need not be sufficiently proven without question. The “SAFETY” of “mandated vaccines” is simply presumed to be in the “public interest” according to general acceptance.
That’s why you need to integrate and spread this intelligence. Because by awakening the masses about the risks, you are actually helping to establish the new “general agreement” that impacts pending court decisions.
This is the ‘remedy’ for governmental and Big Pharma’s efforts to deprive you of your health, safety, faith in God and religious freedom as considered below.(1)
Litigation Activism
On December 3, 2020, I filed a lawsuit in federal court to block the FDA’s approval of the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA “genetic therapies” falsely advertised as “vaccines.” I didn’t file this because I believe I would win. I filed it to protect you, your brain, health and safety, because that is my duty and yours–our collective duty.
________
“You are being brain-washed to believe that the ‘general agreement’ of the ‘herd’ believes that these COVID-19 vaccines are good, safe and effective, and worthy of trusting governors and Big Pharma’s criminals with your life.”
_________
As nearly everyone expects, when the FDA approves the Pfizer and Moderna misrepresented “vaccines,” where the-rubber-meets-the-road is in our “collective consciousness”—our ‘group-mindset’. This is the main reason the phrase “We Are All in This Together” has been selected and promoted to gain mass-persuasion and your compliance with totalitarian impositions—The “Final Solution.”
It is widely-known public knowledge and political history that the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA”) administered the top-secret mind-control program for social-engineering called “MK-ULTRA.”
In law, this administration of MK-ULTRA-like “mind-control” produces what is called “general agreement,” “general-acceptance,” or the “general consensus” in society. And this ‘general agreement’ in society heavily impacts lawmakers and judges in courts of law.
The Legal Importance of “General Acceptance”
In vaccination law that is used to advance forced vaccinations, also called “immunization mandates,” “general agreement” about the benefits of vaccines presumes that efficacy and safety is “generally accepted.”
Actual science is not necessary. The vaccines need not be sufficiently proven without question. The “SAFETY” of “mandated vaccines” is presumed to be in the “public interest” according to general acceptance.
The “compelling interest” of society is presumed to justify forced vaccinations.
This is the “bar” or burden officials and Big Pharma lawyers have thus far operated under. Anyone opposing this “compelling interest” would need to exceed this “bar” to meet the burden of overturning vaccination mandates in order to resist submission to forced blood intoxications.
In addition, “general agreement” holds that the “compelling interest” in public health requires “herd immunity”. Although this presumption is seriously flawed (as I argue below) it is the deciding factor.
The original landmark case of Jacobsen v. Massachusetts established this precedent now being challenged in courts of law across America. The infamous Constitutional attorney Alan Dershowitz debated Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. on this issue. I critically analyzed their defective debate.
Why Sharing this Information is so Important
This is why SHARING THIS INFORMATION IS SO IMPORTANT. Saving-people’s lives depends on it. Saving even civilization from advancing injected artificial intelligence (AI)—the biotechnologies advertised to be injected via vaccinations such a “bio-chips” and “quantum dots”–requires the collective consciousness to establish the compelling social interest to say “NO.”
You likely noticed that the polls preceding Trump’s usurpation were as “rigged” as the election. The polls were rigged to influence behavior, and control the outcome.
The same is true for forced vaccinations. Fake polls have been increasingly published to establish the lie—that the majority of people favor getting vaccinated for COVID-19.
That is, you are being brain-washed to believe that the “general agreement” of the “herd” believes that these COVID-19 vaccines are good, safe and effective, and worthy of trusting governors and Big Pharma’s criminals with your life.
Take, for example the poll published by STAT-Harris in October, 2020, depicted in the graphs below. “The share of Americans interested in getting COVID-19 vaccine as soon as possible is dropping,” this pro-Pharma propaganda warned.
Between August and October 2020, the number of people “likely to get vaccinated” with a COVID-19 vaccine dropped dramatically after Democrats objected to the Trump administration’s handling of the pandemic response.
Black and Hispanic Americans especially voiced concern according to the October 2020 STAT-Harris Poll. “Only 43% of Black individuals said they would pursue a vaccine as soon as it was available, a sharp drop from 65% in mid-August,” the pro-Pharma article reported. ‘Vaccine hesitancy’ got more extreme over the next month as the following CNN Poll publicized. Only 14% of Blacks and 34% of Latinos trusted vaccines.
These numbers overwhelming challenge the “general acceptance” or “general agreement” that vaccines are good, and have profound implications on pending lawsuits opposing forced vaccinations, especially by religious persons as further explained below.
This so-called public health “emergency” reflecting Black and Hispanic “consciousness,” especially in the Black community targeted to receive the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines “first” (along with health workers), impacts the “compelling interest of the state” to force these vaccines on anyone.
The “general agreement” or “general consensus” among Blacks distrusting vaccines largely because of the government’s “Tuskeegee Experiment” and this author’s Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola–Nature, Accident or Intentional? tracking the origin of these plagues to Anglo-American covert operations during the Special Virus Cancer Program, prompted the pro-Pharma mass media to heavily target Blacks so that they can be forced (like poor Whites) to get vaccinated to retain or gain privileges, such as being able to fly on an airplane, gain employment, or receive social benefits.
The screenshots below show the polls and propaganda used to convince Black people that the Pfizer and Moderna “genetic therapies” are great.
by
The Old Case Law Undermining Constitutional Rights and Religious Freedom
You may recall that the First Amendment to the Constitution guarantees “Freedom of Religion.” You may also recall that in Jacobsen v. Massachusetts, minister Jacobsen was forced by the “general agreement” that vaccines are good to either pay a $5 fine to abstain, or otherwise submit. Now however, in 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court has recognized the “compelling interest” of Governor Cuomo is insufficient to overrule religious gathering rights.
Comparing Jacobsen and the latest decision in ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF BROOKLYN,NEW YORK v. ANDREW M. CUOMO, GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK, where the-rubber-meets-the-road in this discussion, pursuant to widespread public acceptance of forced vaccinations as “safe and effective” for “immunizations,” the Supreme Court in Jacobson held:
“A common belief, like common knowledge, does not require evidence to establish its existence, but may be acted upon without proof by the legislature and the courts. . . .
“The fact that the belief is not universal is not controlling, for there is scarcely any belief that is accepted by everyone. The possibility that the belief may be wrong, and that science may yet show it to be wrong, is not conclusive; for the legislature has the right to pass laws which, according to the common belief of the people, are adapted to prevent the spread of contagious diseases. In a free country, where the government is by the people, through their chosen representatives, practical legislation admits of no other standard of action; for what the people believe is for the common welfare must be accepted as tending to promote the common welfare, whether it does in fact of not. Any other basis would conflict with the spirit of the Constitution, and would sanction measures opposed to a republican form of government. While we do not decide and cannot decide that vaccination is a preventive of smallpox, we take judicial notice of the fact that this is the common belief of the people of the State, and with this fact as a foundation we hold that the statute in question is a health law, enacted in a reasonable and proper exercise of the police power.” 72 N.E. Rep. 97.
The New Case Law Securing Constitutional Rights and Religious Freedom
Superseding Jacobsen v. Massachusetts, in the case of ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF BROOKLYN v. CUOMO, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on November 25, 2020, to enjoin New York Governor Cuomo from depriving religious groups in a “red zone,” versus businesses in an “orange zone,” from congregating.
The Supreme Court granted the religious objectors an injunction against the forced deprivation of gathering rights based on the “Likelihood of success on the merits. The applicants . . . made a strong showing that the challenged restrictions violate ‘the minimum requirement of neutrality’ to religion. Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. Hialeah, 508 U. S. 520, 533 (1993).
In other words, ‘neutrality to religion’ must be honored and administered by all state and federal officials.
Now that only leaves private companies, such as Facebook, Google, Amazon, the airlines, and thousands of multi-national corporations potentially free to violate people’s religious rights by mandating forced vaccinations for employment or air travel.
_________
“Does the general acceptance of all religions espousing faith in Holy Spiritual function/administration of protection/restoration of health reflect the compelling interest of the state, as well as private companies, to apply First Amendment religious freedom protections for the exception/exemption from mandatory vaccinations.”
_________
Religious Freedom, Spiritual Sustenance, and General Acceptance
What all of this history neglects, and where the-rubber-will-ultimately-meet-the-road, is with the fundamental and quintessential “general agreement” among all religious groups in the “Holy Spirit” power administering healing.
All monotheists agree (with Zen Buddhists too) that there is a Holy Spirit power of Love (or “chi energy”) that protects us, sustains us, rejuvenates us, and heals us.
Common knowledge and agreement in the religious world is that the “Holy Spirit Power of Love” immunizes us against evil, biological and social discord, and illness. That is the foundation of religion (karmic law in Buddhism as well, and even medical theology in Chinese acupuncture, etc.). This Holy Spirit protection and restoration is also the general agreement among the vast-majority of people worldwide.
Consequently, the main presumed legal question raised by forced vaccinations based on the high “bar” of “general acceptance,” as well as society’s “compelling interest,” is seriously flawed.
How so?
So far, the legal presumption and main question diverts from the “truth that shall set us free.”
The most important legal question addressing society’s ‘general agreement’ should be:
“Does the general acceptance of all religions espousing faith in Holy Spiritual function/administration of protection/restoration of health reflect the compelling interest of the state, as well as private companies, to apply First Amendment religious freedom protections for the exception/exemption from mandatory vaccinations.”
The answer to this question is what must eventually be decided at the level of the U.S. Supreme Court.
MK-ULTRA Social Engineering to Promote General Acceptance of Forced Vaccinations Can Never Exceed the Bar of Religious/Spiritual Persons
Now anyone who is “conscious,” reasonably aware of politics and geopolitics advancing globalism and more totalitarian controls over civilization, advancing artificial intelligence (“AI”) toward a “Final Solution” that relies on forced vaccinations advertised to include “bio-chips” for merging medical data, even people’s brains with the Cloud, must now consider the strategic importance of MK-ULTRA-like mind-control and social engineering programs.
General acceptance of this corporate-fascist state requires more persuasive polling, advertising, and marketing to overcome the decreasing faith and trust in forced vaccinations. The mass awakening does not, nor cannot, trust Big Pharma more than God. Nor can vaccines, such as Pfizer and Moderna’s “game changing” mRNA “genetic therapies” (falsely called vaccinations) compete with the Holy Spirit Power of Love that provides protection and does all the healing.
The Big Pharma, Big Tech and Big Banking globalists cannot ever overcome this hurdle. They will never be able to evade the “spiritual consensus” for faithful loving people.
This spells doom for Big Pharma and political governors who still push COVID-19 impositions, forced vaccinations, and social restrictions.
The heavy burden on the drug/vaccine industry is akin to convincing viewers witnessing the vaccine parade that those in charge are not disgracefully ‘nude,’ but all wear beautiful clothes. That is, forced vaccinations sponsored by the global elite—the owners, investors, stockholders, the Emperors of Big Pharma, Big Tech, and Big Banking—are royally EXPOSED.
To overcome this reality, this legal hurdle, much more propaganda is needed to convince the “religious herd” that we are not seeing reality for what it is. And even if this MK-ULTRA-like mind control were to increase, it would still fail.
Why?
Because you can’t defeat “Mother Nature.”
To establish the “compelling interest” that COVID-19 vaccines are good, safe, effective, and trustworthy; for injecting/intoxicating our bodies to gain “herd immunity;” increasing amounts of propaganda and attacks against religious activists and groups must be administered to move the population that loves God and the Holy Spirit (Force of nature) to deny the existence of God and the power of the Holy Spirit for healing.
Only criminal psychopaths and delusional idiots would wager on the global elite winning this “Final Battle.”
Conclusion
Now you understand why the corporate-controlled media has been so actively smearing and dividing all religious groups, turning devotees against one-another by the use of fear (not faith), to defraud society, develop/sustain the general agreement that vaccines are safe, effective, and serve a “compelling interest” in helping to protect civilization against the COVID-19 infection.
Those administering this losing battle are criminal psychopaths and delusional.
So please share this information to establish the anti-vaccination general agreement. Educate officials about this “compelling interest” in honoring people’s religious faith and freedom.
By sharing this intelligence, we will all be far better off, far safer, far healthier, and far more “spiritually immunized” against irrational/contrived fears of infectious diseases, rejecting forced vaccinations and all vaccinations in favor of natural cures.
–End–
ATTENTION READERS: The following link is provided for you to submit your comments and concerns to the FDA pursuant to the Pfizer and Moderna vaccine certification process. Below the link is a screenshot of Dr. Horowitz’s opposition submission.
Furthermore, communities nationwide, including schools and workplaces, religious groups, public service organizations and more will need to provide education to their members regarding the risks versus benefits of taking COVID-19 vaccines. Ease confusion. Understand the genetics, geopolitics, and economics underlying the pandemic. Dr. Horowitz, the author of the civil complaint against Pfizer and Moderna, is available help. He can be scheduled for online video-conferencing via Zoom or Skype to educate audiences or debate public health officials who advocate getting vaccinated. Please schedule these events for the benefit of citizens who are required to make life and death decisions with “informed consent.” Kindly contact Dr. Horowitz to schedule his educational service by e-mailing your request to: Editor@MedicalVeritas.org.
E-mail your comments and concerns to the FDA at:
_________
Footnotes:
(1) Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. . . .
Part IV examines the relationship between the state action doctrine and the Establishment Clause. The Supreme Court’s Establishment Clause jurisprudence has begun, in the past decade, to trend toward an approach that amounts to a specialized application of the state action doctrine.
Nonetheless, the touchstone for Establishment Clause cases ostensibly remains the test articulated in Lemon v. Kurtzman. This Part argues that, where the challenged action is found to be religious, courts should apply the state action doctrine instead of the Lemon test to evaluate Establishment Clause claims.
Applied in this manner, the state action doctrine is a better tool than the Lemon test for clearly and succinctly distinguishing religious activities protected by the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause from those prohibited by the Establishment Clause.
Moreover, such an application would bring Establishment Clause jurisprudence into harmony with other suits alleging constitutional violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.23
This Part then examines three recent circuit court cases that demonstrate how the application of the state action doctrine instead of the Lemon test results in greater clarity and coherence.
https://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/DEVO_10.pdf
See: DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAW STATE ACTION AND THE PUBLIC/PRIVATE DISTINCTION 250 HARVARD LAW REVIEW [Vol. 123:1248 I. INTRODUCTION]
In the Civil Rights Cases, 1) the Supreme Court laid down the bright-line rule of state action; 2) the federal government does not possess the power to regulate the policies and practices of private entities under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment; 3) In the years following this landmark decision, the Court transformed the state action doctrine.
About the Author:
Dr. Leonard Horowitz
Leonard Horowitz, D.M.D., M.A., M.P.H., D.N.M. (hon.), D.M.M. (hon.), is the author of twenty three books, including the prophetically titled Death In The Air: Globalism,Terrorism and Toxic Warfare that came out three months before 9-11-01. That book deals with biological and energy weapons being used for population control. His three American best-sellers include: Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola–Nature, Accident or Intentional? that was largely responsible for prompting explosive interest in vaccination risks, secret cancer virus operations, and biological warfare; Healing Codes for the Biological Apocalypse, that revealed the original Solfeggio musical scale secreted for millennia; and Healing Celebrations: Miraculous Recoveries Through Ancient Scripture, Natural Medicine and Modern Science in which Dr. Horowitz presents his protocol for administering prevention and speedier recoveries. His text, The Book of 528: Prosperity Key of LOVE, has prompted a revolution in the music industry improving recording artistry and music therapy with the use of C=528Hz(A=444Hz) tuning that produces “medicinal music” increasing anti-oxidant activity and greater protection against infections and cancers. Dr. Horowitz’s documentary, UN-VAXXED: A Docu-commentary for Robert De Niro won five international awards, including “Best Film – 2016” in London and Geneva competitions.
