Changing Ethics in Vaccination Trials
Changing Ethics in Vaccination Trials During Emergencies: Ebola Zaire 2018-19 and Neglected Refrigerators
Leonard G. Horowitz,
DMD, MA, MPH, DNM (hon.), DMM (hon.)
Ethics is defined as “the moral principles that govern a person’s behavior or the conducting of an activity,” in this case, vaccination trials during an emergency.
In recent years, medical ‘ethicists’ have generated much controversy, especially in the realms of vaccinology and genetic engineering. Vaccination risk analysts express concerns that genetic damage from vaccines that are made from liquified microbial proteins and altered gene sequences can result in cancers and other diseases not being reported by ‘captured’ regulators or manufacturers protecting conflicting interests. In this controversy, medical ethics are questioned, especially during human vaccine trials. Most recently emergency outbreaks of diseases such as Ebola out-breaking in 2014 and again in 2018, has prompted ethicists and industrialists to argue in favor of expanding permissions for human experimentation based on ethical considerations.
This ethics controversy has expanded at the same time many people worldwide have awakened to the fraud that is endemic in medicine, especially in the vaccine industry, with movies such as VAXXED and UN-VAXXED—A Docu-commentary for Robert De Niro, generating substantial publicity. The latter gained five international awards, including “Best Film—2016” in London and Geneva World International Film Festival competitions. These and other controversial works evidence rampant corruption in government agencies tainted by conflicting interests.
For instance, VAXXED reveals a cover-up at the CDC to conceal skyrocketing rates of autism linked to mercury toxicity from MMR vaccines. UN-VAXXED—A Docu-commentary for Robert De Niro exposes the intelligence agents and agencies most responsible for the industry’s cover-ups. Concerns are expressed that leading vaccination proponents, including Bill Gates of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation—the world’s leading vaccine distributor and promoter—also finances and encourages dramatic reductions in global populations. Gates has lectured that vaccines will reduce populations by fifteen (15) percent.
A dictum in medical sociology recognizes that ‘no epidemic in history has ever evolved divorced from major socio-economic and political upheaval.’
Given this controversial context, ethical issues pose substantial challenges that have been generally neglected in scientific and lay discussions. Meanwhile, new proposals and arguments have been advancing in political and commercial communities to expand ethical considerations to permit human vaccination experiments during emergencies. ‘Emergency circumstances’ are being used in Africa today, for example, to justify what many call “unethical human vaccine trials” in Ebola outbreak regions. These areas are associated war-carnage and immigration-crises. Human rights violations in these troubled areas are often acknowledged as being ‘genocidal.’ Vaccine experiments in these areas, or mandates under emergency circumstances proposed currently in many nations, compound this controversy.
Under scrutiny in Africa today is the United Nations’ World Health Organization’s activity with the U.S. National Institute for Allergies and Infectious Disease’s (NIAID’s) Vaccine Research Center. These entities have partnered with GlaxoSmithKline to co-develop a new vaccine sought to remedy Ebola disease. These organizations investing in population-management and even depopulation strategies are claiming the Ebola outbreak is an ‘opportunity’ to expand their ‘ethics policies’ to test their experimental vaccine labeled, ‘cAd3-EBOZ’. These organizations have formed an alliance with the Public Health Agency of Canada and Merck & Co., Inc.’s to advance a presumably competing product labeled, ‘rVSV-ZEBOV.’ Critics contend these entities are exploiting the circumstances and people by advancing unethical human experiments in the politically-unstable commercially-repressed nation of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).
These unnerving condemnations are consistent with the U.N. Ambassador from the U.S., Nikki Haley, calling the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and their Human Rights Council a “cesspool of political bias” and scientific corruption.
Amid fiery criticism about the United States and Israel’s withdrawal from that “cesspool,” the Trump administration has called these U.N. operations “counter to human rights standards.” Earlier, President Trump inferred that too many unproven vaccinations were being given to Americans as well, a criticism backed by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
At this level of socio-political and commercial corruption and controversy, at the end of April 2018, the ‘new outbreak’ of Ebola Zaire Virus (EZV) raised further suspicions. The EZV suddenly re-emerged in the north-eastern part of the DRC from a refrigerator.
Scandalous as that statement may seem, there is no other reasonable explanation for this precise strain of EZV to have re-emerged from some unknown hiding place in 1976 when it first broke-out in Zaire (now called the DRC), only to fade away until 2014 when it suddenly inexplicably re-appeared in Liberia. Again between 2014 and 2018, the virus and disease disappeared.
A dictum in medical sociology recognizes that “no epidemic in history has ever evolved divorced from major socio-economic and political upheaval.” So it is incriminating to science and the media that no attention has been given to this ‘refrigerator theory.’ In today’s world it is unreasonable and irresponsible to neglect the likelihood of Ebola’s intentional release to obtain political and financial gains. This would be a form of bio-terrorism and bio-terroristic threatening.
This unsettling consideration is also corroborated by the statements of America’s leading medical sociologist, Stephen J. Kunitz. Writing in the the American Journal of Public Health about “Globalization, States, and the Health of Indigenous Peoples” Kunitz observed that where-ever Anglo-American multi-national corporations tread, genocide against natives follows.
As reported extensively by this author, the 2014 Ebola re-emergence was perfectly timed to pressure Liberia’s President, Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, into signing a controversial oil drilling deal with Big Energy–Big Pharma’s Deep State ally in globalization and investment banking.
Liberia, at that time of EZV’s reemergence, was the world’s most tumultuous and controversial country. Oil drilling operations off its coast were socio-politically, economically, and commercially challenged. At the same time, money was pouring-in from the International Monetary Fund at the request of President Sirleaf, the winner of the 2011 Nobel Peace Prize, and 2012 Indira Gandhi Prize for Peace, Disarmament and Development.
The Refrigerator Requirement
Grasp the certainty (not simply theory) of a refrigerator being the only commonality between the 1976, 2014, and 2018 EZV outbreaks. A refrigerator acts as an ‘un-natural reservoir’ capable of vectoring Ebola’s return to headline news. This best account of the man-made outbreaks is proven by a preponderance of evidence. Discover this evidence by examining the science and history of that precise EZV strain. Compare those facts with the stupid propaganda used to divert from this certainty (scientists would call ‘high probability’). Every reasonably intelligent investigator must thereby conclude that the media and scientific community has obviously concealed the lab virus’s origin and imposed outbreaks.
Such stupidity, for example, was demonstrated in 2018 by what the WHO stated as “Facts” about the Ebola Virus Disease (EVD): “The virus is transmitted to people from wild animals and spreads in the human population through human-to-human transmission.” But immediately below this misrepresentation-by-omissions the WHO stated: “Ebola virus disease (EVD) first appeared in 1976 in 2 simultaneous outbreaks, one in what is now, Nzara, South Sudan, and the other in Yambuku, Democratic Republic of Congo.”
These two locations are 400 miles apart. It is delusional to believe some un-identified ‘animal’ could teleport itself instantly that distance to ‘simultaneously’ infect humans with the same strain of EZV. Especially since that virus is highly unstable. It alters its genome rapidly between ‘horizontal’ transmissions (i.e., from one animal to another.)
Skeptics argue rapid transit could account for that 400 mile transmission. But in 1976 transit in this part of Africa was not so ‘rapid.’ Certainly not for an Ebola carrying wild animal or native. The same animal or infected person would need to have vectored the simultaneous outbreaks. That stretches credulity and shames skeptics and trolls.
If that stupid explanation is not incredulous enough, further research and propaganda analysis showed more WHO fraud. The U.N. sponsored health agency fraudulently claimed in 2014 that ‘fruit bats’ were the likeliest ‘natural reservoir’ for this strain of EZV. So I investigated. I quickly determined that ‘official story’ was obviously false. A review of the WHO’s scientific reference purportedly found four percent (4%) of bats tested in Bangladesh (Asia) were claimed to carry antibodies for “African Ebola” found thousands of miles apart! And 4% similarity in the virology world of gene tracking is probably not even ‘statistically significant.’ It may be recalled that the simian-immunodeficiency virus in chimpanzees (SIVcpz) is more than 60% identical to human AIDS–HIV. Yet, no scientist is claiming they know for sure that a chimp sourced AIDS.
Why not? 60% genetic correspondence is indicting. The answer again involves a vaccine refrigerated vector contaminating the Merck Drug Co.’s experimental hepatitis B vaccines given to gay men in NYC, central African natives, and Willowbrook mentally-retarded children on Staten Island in New York between 1972 and 1974. Those known-contaminated viral vaccines were produced in chimpanzees housed by Litton Bionetics, as further detailed below.
Accordingly, silence accompanies this ‘smoking gun’ of lab virus transmission. These facts shame and indict the media and scientific community. Thus, the taboo topic is criminally neglected.
Similarly with Ebola, it was obvious to me that WHO officials worked overtime to divert and conceal the necessary refrigerator. Mind you, when this relatively unstable lab virus (recombinant) jumps from one host to another, much like HIV/AIDS, it mutates. It is no longer the same strain. The 1976 EZV and 2014 EZV and 2018 EZV microbes were the same strain, as determined by genetic sequencing. That is conclusive evidence supporting the refrigerator thesis.
I concluded that the Liberia outbreak accompanied the “major socio-economic and political upheaval” involving BigPharma/BigEnergy, and only that best explained the 2014 outbreak that killed more than 1,000 Liberians.
Similarly, I conclude the 2018 Ebola outbreak was administered to at minimum contrive justification for unethical vaccine trials, for which complicit scientists calling themselves ‘ethicists’ justify expanding ethical considerations under emergency conditions. This activity is called “crisis capitalism.” It is standard procedure for multi-national corporations expanding, as Kunitz reviewed, genocides killing citizens of lesser-developed nations.
Silence on the Ebola Refrigerator
During the 2014 Ebola Emergency, my refrigerator thesis fell on deaf ears. The captured health agencies responsible for outputting propaganda certainly did not want attention diverted to their refrigerators. The mainstream media went silent too, and their silence was accompanied by frightening ‘fake news.’ As a result, money poured into the health agencies following the fright to bolster defenses.
In protest I wrote, “This is the same pseudoscience and scam the CDC perpetrated in 1967 after Ebola’s mother–the Marburg virus–broke out in three vaccine production plants simultaneously in Germany and Yugoslavia from a shipment of Monkeys from Litton Bionetics.” Officials and news reporters in 2014 ignored my notices.
I see the ethical dialogue generated by the mainstream media and captured scientific community as central to a scheme to normalize political impositions and human rights violations in preparation for a massive depopulation event or series of events.
I witnessed a pattern and practice of silence, ‘fake news,’ and censorship during the 2014 Ebola Emergency. As Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wrote: “Conduct which forms a basis for inference is evidence. Silence is often evidence of the most persuasive character.” United States ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod, 263 US 149 – Supreme Court 1923. The ‘madstream’ media incriminated itself by remaining silent on my research and the refrigerator certainty. Sherri Kane and I condemned this common malpractice in a series of EbolaGate articles such as this one about Breitbart, this one concerning the Washington Post, and this one exposing The Guardian. Add Google/YouTube’s shocking blocking of my 157 videos just before the ‘Ebola Emergency,’ and this wholesale fraud and criminal conspiracy is proven by more than a ‘preponderance of evidence.’
Linked here is a good example of ‘fake news’ coordination that evades substantive truths in favor of political deceptions and propaganda that secures the ‘crisis capitalism.’
Further protesting the Ebola refrigerator censorship, Kane and I produced a 24-minute educational video also censored by Google/YouTube. As a public service, I also provided a freely downloadable book chapter on Ebola published in my American best-selling book, Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola–Nature, Accident or Intentional? I hoped thereby to generate public debate on these criminal matters. I believed the incriminating evidence of crimes risking people’s lives internationally was important enough to consider. And later Kane and I contributed articles to ExposingVaccineGenocide.org, including this very important research review exposing the scam underlying mandatory vaccination programs. Nonetheless, the genocide advocates and evil-obedient remained silent.
Accordingly, having stated and irrefutably evidenced that, “Vaccines, the ‘Sacred Cow of Public Health,’ are ‘genocidal weapons for mass depopulation,’” and witnessing the deafening silence surrounding this truth, my considerations and conclusions are most unnerving, albeit most reasonable. These include the fact that the current outbreak area is the province of North Kivu, which is among the most populated provinces in the DRC with eight million inhabitants. This fact strains the notion of a ‘wild-animal-in-tropical-rain-forest-vector.’ That hypothesis is far less reasonable than my refrigerator hypothesis. This wild animal idea obviously diverts from the more relevant subjects of depopulation and population management experiments in densely populated areas under crisis and attacks using bioweapons such as Ebola.
I declare these contrived deadly emergencies evidence ‘crisis capitalism’ wrapped in pseudo-ethical rhetoric.
Again, no one is talking about this in the media or scientific communities. And that silence is unreasonable, irresponsible, and incriminating.
This region of the DNC is burdened by “intense insecurity and [a] worsening humanitarian crisis.” There are now more than “one million internally displaced people and a continuous efflux of refugees to the neighboring countries, including Uganda, Burundi and Tanzania,” the WHO reported.
At the same time, in the more advanced industrialized nations, the media and entertainment industries have so diverted and anesthetized audiences that even an emergency threatening a million people is likely to go virtually unnoticed.
Only special interests advancing commercial agendas regularly attend and exploit these matters. Only then might their media give coverage to the human rights violations collateral to the acts of sabotage and espionage, as seen in the Ebola crises.
A diversionary practice accompanies this fraud. It is called “controlled opposition.” Critics are paid to divert to lesser crimes under control by the same paymasters. Special interests control both sides of every debate. They wield the ‘fake news’ media–both left and right. This is widely known in the intelligence community and among corporate leaders.
Tracking Profitable Depopulation to the WHO and NIAID
In this context of ‘controlled opposition’ and social control, the largest and most influential health agencies have been ‘captured.’ This includes the WHO and NIAID.
Having tracked the emerging viruses—AIDS and Ebola—to their precise source laboratories and precise vector vaccinations more thoroughly and scientifically than anyone in the world, I claim this indictment as fact. I conclude the current EZV ‘outbreak’ in the DRC is more than a covert operation used to justify ethical breaches in a new wave of human vaccination trials. I see the ethical dialogue generated by the mainstream media and captured scientific community as central to a scheme to normalize political impositions and human rights violations in preparation for a massive depopulation event or series of events. I declare these contrived deadly emergencies evidence ‘crisis capitalism’ wrapped in pseudo-ethical rhetoric.
This socio-political turmoil supports the man-made origin and refrigeration certainty, because it is unreasonable that a wild-animal reservoir would use this political excuse to transmit Ebola. That would strain the notion of an ‘opportunistic infection.’ Unlike covert agents for the National Institutes for Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and WHO, justifying their existence by such outbreaks and emergencies, wild-animals lack that cunning.
The Big Pharma enterprise partnered with the captured NIAID and WHO emerged as primary suspects in my 1993-96 origin of HIV/AIDS investigation as well. I documented this alliance of special interests in my book Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola–Nature, Accident or Intentional? That is why the United Nations, that sponsors the WHO, and their AIDS group hosted by the UN AIDS Secretariat to the UN Theme Group on AIDS, attempted to censor my works in this field. Such censorship is akin to scientific evidence tampering. In effect, such censorship and silence aids-and-abets genocide and is unconscionable. But the suspects’ malicious actions against me and my works only evidence their ‘scienter’ and criminal intent.
Just consider, for a minute, the name “National Institute for Allergies and Infectious Diseases” (NIAID). What do allergies and infectious diseases have in common to justify a single American agency controlling both fields in medicine? The answer is vaccinations and vaccine-induced intoxications. How so?
Allergies are mainly caused by vaccine ingredients. Foreign proteins and microbe parts from viruses and bacteria are injected into the blood of victims causing ‘antigenic complexes’ to form in intoxicated bodies. That is, foreign proteins land on your own proteins causing white-blood-cell-bodyguards to get confused. These ‘WBCs’ go haywire. They start attacking your own body. That is called ‘auto-immune disease.’ Allergies are simply one of nearly 100 new auto-immune diseases obviously arising from vaccines produced in chickens’ eggs, cows, or monkeys that ate grasses for example, and conveyed these ‘antigens’ to the vaccines. These animals’ immune reactants were transmitted to human bloodstreams and immune cells that way. That is how the human cells are induced to declare war inside your body. Every springtime when grass pollen fills the air, your intoxicated body reacts with stuffy sinuses and teary eyes.
Here again, how is this disease transmitted? Through refrigerators. How are the viruses used to produce all vaccines stored? In refrigerators. How did the quickly mutating Ebola Zaire strain pop out 400 miles away as though it was teleported? A refrigerator. How did the 2014 same strain emerge suddenly in 2018 unaltered by the years and long distance travel. Skeptics and PharmaTrolls blame some unknown “wild animal.” The NIAID and WHO would never want to indict a refrigerator.
The Genocide Imposed by Refrigerator Outbreaks for ‘Ethical’ Commerce
In the Journal of Medical Ethics, author Phillippe Calain discussed the ethical challenges facing science concerning Ebola vaccine trials in the DRC and elsewhere. Calain chaired the WHO ethics panel in August 2014 during the Ebola Emergency. He summarized his article by writing, “The complex issues examined in this essay illustrate how the Ebola epidemic has stripped conventional research ethics from its veil of comfort.”
Think about that statement. A virus, or its epidemic, has “stripped conventional research ethics.” Do viruses really have such power? Do viruses have moral souls? Are viruses able to “strip” vaccine industrialists of their “research ethics? Did the epidemic do this? Or was this only committed by a human acting with other humans?
Moreover, do “conventional research ethics” have a “veil of comfort?” Or is it the vaccine industrialists and arrogant vaccine advocates who feel uncomfortable about ethics and human rights?
Calain’s statement, upon close examination, shows classic rhetoric!
Calain, obviously a WHO ‘insider’ biased in favor of the vaccine industry, declared that he has no conflicting interests other than his ‘personal’ views as a WHO insider.
Calain concluded: “One could deplore that none of the promising treatments used in Ebola field trials could so far be convincingly confirmed as curative.52
Notice the use of Calain’s adjective “promising,” describing vaccines and justifying their trials. Alternatively, the adjective “deadly” vaccines would not advance Calain’s career. It would terminate it. Thus, how honest can such ‘science’ be? How ethical is this deceptive practice?
“Regardless,” Calain continued, “with their variable merits and shortcomings, those emergency clinical trials conducted in the course of a major epidemic could collectively contribute to building pragmatic foundations of disaster research ethics.”
In other words, setting aside all the risks of side effects. Overlooking new emerging autoimmune diseases from vaccinations. Disregarding new cancers from genetic damage. Neglecting there being no effective vaccine against Ebola. Officials only hoping of future success, regardless of these “variable merits and shortcomings.” Social scientists and population managers have great opportunities to establish new ethics standards in favor of BigPharma and stockholders in Merck and GlaxoSmithKlein, Calain cunningly conceals.
And if that is not disgusting enough as ‘peer reviewed’ evidence of widespread criminal psychopathology, consider more. Reflect on this scheming of justifications for pan-genocide (i.e., ‘vaccinecide’). Calain added, “the Ebola trials have shown that, provided that sound scientific standards of research are respected, individual and collective interests do not necessarily compete when it comes to treating catastrophic diseases and testing unproven interventions. One way to reconcile individual and collective values is to use trial designs adapted to distinct catastrophic circumstances.”
In other words, let’s overlook the fact that the entire vaccine industry is corrupt. Let’s disregard the fact that no ‘proven’ vaccines can be trusted because no risk/benefit science has ever compared whether or not we are killing and maiming more people than we are helping or saving by vaccines. Then, let’s “reconcile individual and collective values” by encouraging BigPharma to start outbreaks in war-torn or politically-unstable countries so we may expand our ethical and moral codes. Alternatively, we should lift our “veil of comfort,” as Calain called it, to not only inject more refrigerated immune-system destroying bioweapons into humanity’s bloodstream. We must also justify or morally-embrace depopulation by adapting “to distinct catastrophic circumstances” secretly financed and imposed by the global enterprise. We must neglect, like Calain does, controlling interests in the WHO, aided-and-abetted by ignorant and blind commercial agents like Calain. This is the new world of science, operating under the guise of ‘ethics’ stewarding corporate treason.
No risk/benefit science has ever compared whether or not we are killing and maiming more people than we are helping or saving by vaccines.
Calain hypocritically added in his conclusion, “This exercise would be more meaningful if ethicists and social scientists seized the opportunity to bring the voice of victims, investigators, clinicians and survivors into ethical debates that have too often been disembodied and rhetorical.”
“Disembodied and rhetorical” best describes Calain’s pioneering paper that argues why we should simply change our ethical and moral standards during outbreaks, rather than look at the true socio-political and economic cause(s) of the refrigerated releases.
Finally, we should bring our voices “into ethical debates.” But where, Mr. Calain? In totally-controlled media outlets, captured science journals, ‘fake news’ television networks, press conglomerates, and institutions for ‘higher education,’ all financed by the same devil-doers acting to rid the world of ‘useless eaters’?
“Beam me up, Scotty. There’s no intelligent life forms on this planet.”
Closing Refrigerator Doors
In closing this ‘ethics discussion,’ it must be known that this Ebola-struck region of the DRC is not far from the 30,000 square miles that President Mobutu granted the Nazi-linked OTRAG (Orbital Transport and Missiles, Lid.) organization to experiment on more than rockets and missiles. According to a high-ranking Soviet press official and Radio Moscow’s science reporter, Boris Belitsky, during the early seventies OTRAG commissioned medical doctors and immunologists “given the assignment to cultivate viruses ordinarily affecting only animals but constituting a potential danger to man. They were particularly interested in certain unknown viruses isolated from the African green monkey, and capable of such rapid replication that they could completely destabilize the immune system. These viruses, however, were quite harmless for human beings and the lab’s assignment was to develop a mutant virus that would be a human killer.”
A subsequent OTRAG contract covered 760,000 inhabitants subjected to ‘scientific’ impositions between 1976 (the year Ebola first broke out in this country) and 2000 when the OTRAG contract purportedly ended. Theses facts I published in Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola–Nature, Accident or Intentional?
I recalled that before 1969, the only American organizations stockpiling simian monkey viruses for vaccine makers and bioweapons contractors was the WHO’s ‘reference centre’ in San Antonio, TX, the National Institutes of Health, and the National Cancer Institute. Further research showed OTRAG collaborated with the Central Intelligence Agency in 1975, at the height of the CIA’s paramilitary operations in that exact region. All the monkeys, monkey viruses, and cancer virus ‘cell lines’ used to produce vaccines worldwide, including in Russia and in the Middle East, were trafficked by Litton Bionetics at that time.
That company was controlled by Roy Ash, the President of Litton Industries. Litton Bionetics was the medical lab that administered all the contracts for the National Cancer Institute, and ran America’s biological weapons testing center in Ft. Detrick, MD. Roy Ash was a leading fund-raiser for the Republican Party. In 1969, Ash was appointed by President Nixon to lead the American business community. Nixon’s alternative for that job was Henry Kissinger. Instead, Nixon made Kissinger National Security Advisor overseeing the CIA, the NSA and foreign policy.
The contract Mobuto signed with OTRAG was likely brokered by Kissinger for three reasons: (1) Kissinger was a Jewish Nazi, who served General Bolling in the Army’s exfiltration program called Project Paperclip. Kissinger personally identified and drafted Nazi scientists into the American military and IG Farben’s successor companies; (2) Kissinger penned National Security Memorandum 200 that called for massive depopulation; and (3) Kissinger ordered the development of the AIDS and Ebola-type viruses, precisely as Soviet press secretary Belitsky testified.
Anglo-American liars have repeatedly denounced, disclaimed, and misrepresented Russian officials’ statements regarding HIV/AIDS being an American lab virus creation. They have falsely claimed that Russian officials retracted such allegations. Belitsky’s statements aforementioned statements were never retracted. In fact, they were all repeatedly corroborated.
The Anglo-American falsehood is proven false, for instance, by the adjacent screenshot taken from my book, Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola–Nature, Accident or Intentional? It reprints the 1969 U.S. Military Appropriations request for financing $10 million annually for 5-years to develop viruses that were descriptively and functionally identical to HIV/AIDS and Ebola viruses. A related article details how this money was spent by Litton Bionetics.
Anglo genocide neglected
Dear Dr. Horowitz,
The tally is between 17 million and 25 million German civilians genocided after “VE Day”, or between 8 May 1945 and 31 Dec 1953. And that brings the total German WW2 death-toll to between 23 million and 31 million. After annexation and conquest by London-NY-Axis agent Adolf, Gross-Deutschland (Greater Germany) had an overall ethnic-German population of between 100 and 110 million in 1942 in those zones classed as being Reichs-Gebiet (German territory proper), Reichs-Gau (so-called district of the Reich) or Reichs-Nebenland (so-called borderland of the Reich). After WW2, in 1950, the combined ethnic-German population of the core was only 76.29 million (by adding West Germany’s 50.96 million, East Germany’s 18.39 million and Austria’s 6.94 million). Naturally, many ethnic Germans still survived in Poland, communist Russia, Ukraine, Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia, Romania, Hungary, Bulgaria and elsewhere. Many of these later became “Aus-Siedler” (or ethnic-German “out-settlers”, i.e. literally “German immigrants to Germany”). So, unfortunately, the data do confirm that between 23 million and 31 million German Christians were indeed wiped out between Sep 1939 and Dec 1953, the genocide of Christians being fully in line with the stated aims of Luciferian-Freemasonry, but also the genocide of Germans being fully in line with the stated aims of the London-NY-Axis cabal or capstone (the English monarchy, the City of London, Wall Street and the House of Rothschild). London-NY-Axis writings of the early 1900s openly proposed getting rid of the Germans once and for all. Alas, their writings today indicate that this “project” is still a “work in progress”. The Kalergi Plan and recent steps by Angela Merkel (an Israeli dual-citizen and Rothschild puppetician) forebode that all that will remain of the Germans by 2100 AD will be a mixed-race speaking English. Naturally, it is genocide to wipe out a whole culture and its language like that, but the London-NY-Axis is the owner of the UN, and the UN is unlikely to bite the hand that feeds it by ever declaring this “work in progress” an actual case of genocide. In short, the London-NY-Axis can kill whomever it pleases. So nothing has changed, and nothing is likely to change.
All the best,
About the Author
Dr. Leonard Horowitz, D.M.D., M.A., M.P.H., D.N.M. (hon.), D.M.M. (hon.), is the author of twenty-one books, including the prophetically titled Death In The Air: Globalism,Terrorism and Toxic Warfare that came out three months before 9-11-01. That book deals with biological and energy weapons being used for population control. His three American best-sellers include: Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola–Nature, Accident or Intentional? that was largely responsible for prompting explosive interest in vaccination risks and biological warfare; Healing Codes for the Biological Apocalypse, that revealed the ancient Solfeggio musical scale secreted for millennia; and Healing Celebrations: Miraculous Recoveries Through Ancient Scripture, Natural Medicine and Modern Science in which Dr. Horowitz presents his protocol for administering prevention and speedy recoveries. His most recent text, The Book of 528: Prosperity Key of LOVE, has prompted a revolution in the music industry improving recording artistry and music therapy with the use of C=528Hz(A=444Hz) tuning that produces “medicinal music.” Dr. Horowitz’s documentary, UN-VAXXED: A Docu-commentary for Robert De Niro won five international awards, including “Best Film – 2016” in London and Geneva competitions.