Pfizer Court COVID Cover-up
(Fort Myers, FL May 27, 2021)–Judicial Notice has been given in Horowitz v. Pfizer, Moderna et. al, by plaintiff, Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz, moving federal judges to consider the United States Congress’s House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (Republicans) report titled “IN FOCUS: COVID-19 and the Wuhan Institute of Virology, filed May 19, 2021 (hereafter, “IN FOCUS”).
The IN FOCUS record (attached to the Judicial Notice) controverts and moots Defendant Pfizer’s opening and primary opposition to Dr. Horowitz’s Complaint. Pfizer alleged the doctor’s claims are “based on allegations of wild conspiracy theories.”
As stated in Pfizer’s “Motion to Dismiss” Horowitz claims the Defendants’ enterprise conspired with “a series of scammers, including but not limited to media influencers Google, Facebook, MSNBC, NBC, ABC News, CNN, the McChrystal Group, the Poynter Institute [“fact checkers”], and others known and unknown in the medical and public health communities.” Pfizer added, “all with the supposed common goal of ‘mislead[ing] citizens’ about the origins of COVID-19.”
“Now, as the scheme is unwinding with the scammers recanting previous lies,” Dr. Horowitz tells the court, “the IN FOCUS public record corroborates the Plaintiff’s allegations and claims.”
“At the same time, this public record upends Pfizer’s main defense—that Plaintiff Horowitz asserts “unhinged allegations” regarding the pandemic’s origin, and the Defendants’ culpability therein.
Horowitz draws on scientific publications and government patents filed by the devil-doers to back his “civil conspiracy” claim. He recognizes “that Defendants Pfizer and Moderna had foreknowledge of their complicity in a commercial conspiracy to commit unfair and deceptive trade concealing the lab virus origin of the pandemic.”
By this wrongdoing, Horowitz adds, “these Defendants risked and damaged society’s health and safety in their scheme to gain unjust enrichment from the public health emergency.”
Dr. Horowitz filed his lawsuit in defense of his businesses, the entire natural products industry, as well as the religious world challenged by vaccination impositions and genetic intoxication. Damage done to sales of the doctor’s “OxySilverTM with 528″–a competing anti-viral–gives the doctor “standing” to litigate the case. “Anti-competitive damage” was caused by the Pfizer/Moderna/DARPA enterprise against competing products such as hydroxychloroquine and OxySilver, both anti-oxidants and immune boosters.
Regarding the doctor’s “civil conspiracy” claim, his Judicial Notice of IN FOCUS reads: “Defendants Pfizer and Moderna, along with media agents and agencies within the U.S. Government, partnered in the manufacture and testing of lab viruses virtually identical to the COVID-19 respiratory pathogen that emerged from, presumably, the Wuhan bioweapons complex. This activity was largely financed by the U.S./Chinese military-industrial complex in which Defendants participate as a pharmaceutical enterprise.”
In light of people worldwide awakening to these realities, Dr. Horowitz informed the court, “It is unreasonable, irresponsible, and reckless, for Defendants to dismiss the general consensus conclusion and presumption that COVID-19 is attributable to the Defendants’ public/private enterprise.
“If that presumption of collusion is not material enough to withstand Defendants’ motions to dismiss, Defendants’ engagement in a ‘conspiracy of silence’ and censorship is additional evidence most persuasive to deny summary judgments.
“Conduct which forms a basis for inference is evidence,” wrote Judge Brandeis in United States ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod, 263 US 149, 154 – Supreme Court 1923. “Silence is often evidence of the most persuasive character,” Judge Brandeis noted. This is applicable in Horowitz’s lawsuit against Pfizer, Moderna and their media partners, because their “silence” and censorship surrounds the globalists’ Big Pharma, Big Tech, and Big Banking mob administering the treasonous and tyrannical COVID scheme.
Horowitz alleges “the Defendants schemed to commercialize this plague using unfair and deceptive methods of trade and advertising, respectively. Thereafter, the co-conspirators acted to divert investigators from discovering the Defendants’ complicity and liability. Pfizer and Moderna did the same before the eyes of this Court,” Dr. Horowitz’s Judicial Notice reads.
Pfizer filed ad hominem attacks against the doctor’s reputability to prejudice the court against him. This was precisely like their media partners did to smear Horowitz’s reputation and damage his businesses repeatedly since 2008.
“That’s how they control you, Horowitz explained off the record. “They don’t need to kill you if they control you and your businesses. They learn from, and steal from, leaders in every field they monopolize.”
“Having been officially vindicated by the IN FOCUS record, I’ve asked the Pfizer Court to take Judicial Notice of this new intelligence, and Pfizer’s resistance to this “General acceptance.” The lab virus origin of this devastating pandemic was, or should have been, known to Pfizer’s and Moderna’s scientists and officials. Yet this truth has been denied and derided nonetheless. That’s what the cartel has been doing to me since I began writing about the origin of AIDS in 1993.”
CLICK HERE to read or download a copy of Dr. Horowitz’s Judicial Notice.
[Editor’s note: Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute for Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and Dr. Francis Collins, Director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), have both been determined to have granted money to the Wuhan laboratory military/biomedical program for use in altering bat coronaviruses for “gain-of-function” purposes. 18 U.S. Code § 960 – criminalizes this activity by stating in pertinent part: “Whoever, within the United States, knowingly . . . provides or prepares a means for or furnishes the money for, or takes part in, any military . . . enterprise to be carried on from thence against the territory or dominion of any foreign . . . state, or of any colony, district, or people with whom the United States is at peace, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.”